The Neville Awards
Home | The Liberals' Corner | Hypocrisy Watch | Recommended Media | The Butcher's Bill |
Obama's Daily March To Socialism & Surrender | The Obama Gallery | Videos


We Are Being Absorbed and the Muslims Want Us Dead -- Happy New Year!


By Gary Starr for the Neville Awards
Dec. 31, 2010



Building a mosque at the 9/11 site is the equivalent of building the Al-aqsa mosque on the site of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem.

The story continues below the related articles box.

Related Articles:

The Latest Islamic Outrage: Ritual Footbaths at Airports and Universities
Archbishop of Canterbury calls for Sharia Law in Great Britain
Mark Steyn and the Canadian Human Rights Commission
Ezra Levant and the Canadian Human Rights Commission
The Latest Islamic Outrage: Muslim Charter Schools -- Three Articles
The Latest Islamic Outrage: Muslim Charter Schools Part 2-- Three Articles
Islamic Banking-Shariah's Trojan Horse
Islamic Banking-Shariah's Trojan Horse Part 2
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law -- Four Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 2 -- Three Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 3 -- Three Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 4 -- Two Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 5 -- Three Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 6 -- Three Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 7 -- Honor Killing and Muslim Holidays in the U.S. -- Two Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 8-Free Speech Under Attack -- Four Articles
Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood -- Sharia Law Part 9 -- Four Articles

Muslim Scum to Build Mosque Steps Away from the 9/11 Site
Muslim Scum to Build Mosque Steps Away from the 9/11 Site -- Part 2

WE ARE AT WAR WITH ISLAM AND ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION OF PEACE!!!
Fitna: The Film Islam and the Jihadists don't want you to see
UK Bans Michael Savage -- Free Speech Under Assault
Neville's Jihad Archives -- All Articles Posted to the site on the Advancing Jihad Against the West
Western Civilization is being conquered from within and without with the aid of the politically correct liberals and Leftists. The stealth jihad is active both in Europe and the United States. Our Fraudinator-in-Chief's two-year Muslim outreach program has failed. Pro-terrorism attitudes and anti-Western sentiments are the order of the day.

Imam Rauf is still actively promoting the Ground Zero Mosque by taking his show on the road. He's going to be doing "outreach" in 2011 to any American apologists who will listen.

In Brooklyn the call to prayer is now part of the daily landscape:



Try ringing church bells in Saudi Arabia and see how that works out for you...

Through ICANN the internet is now being hijacked by Islamists:

From Daniel Greenfield:

There has been a good deal of talk about Net Neutrality, but the Clinton Administration's internationalization of ICANN means that there's a much more serious threat to freedom of speech on the internet than even the FCC. A threat that hardly anyone is talking about.

Here's a brief excerpt of a much longer piece

10) Further alterations to the geographical makeup of ICANN's Board of Directors would mean a considerable shift in power towards the Arab League, which would presumably vote as a bloc far more than preexisting Geographic Regions.

12) Should the League of Arab States gain bloc voting power at ICANN, there is every indication that it will seek to replicate its effective takeover of the United Nations General Assembly, likely in conjunction with the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).

15) On October 28, 2010, at OIC-CERT's Second Annual General Meeting, OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu noted the following as a core mission of OIC-CERT: "In view of the phenomena of discrimination, stereotyping and defamation targeting Muslims and their religion known as 'Islamophobia,' we invite the OIC-CERT to use its available professional and technical resources (in line with its objectives stated in terms of reference) in order to cooperate with the 'OIC Islamophobia Observatory' to identify the best ways and means including technical, administrative and legal tools to combat anti-Islamic contents on the internet."


The OIC has already effectively used the UN to push its censorship agenda. But the UN is virtually toothless when it comes to the United States. However if the Muslim world can dominate ICANN the way it dominates the UN General Assembly, then free speech on the internet is dead.

If this succeeds then 10 years from now, not only will sites like Jihad Watch or Religion of Peace lose their domain names, and most discussion of Islamic terrorism have to 'go on the run' in pop up social media groups that constantly get shut down (already the situation on sites such as Facebook) functioning like rats in the walls. But even the sites of mainstream politicians and newspapers will be targeted. Mandatory filtering by ISP's. The removal of Israel's Il domain, are all possibilities. And if anything I probably haven't gone far enough.

The internet will become what the UN General Assembly is, a voice that speaks the Islamic narrative as one and bans any discussion or debate. Or marginalizes it so far that it never gets heard.

Is this already underway? Yes.


A recent Pew Research poll about Muslims found the following:

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1814/muslim-public-opinion-hamas-hezbollah-al-qaeda-islam-role-in-politics-democracy?src=prc-latest&proj=forum
  • Many Muslims see a struggle between those who want to modernize their country and Islamic fundamentalists. Only in Jordan and Egypt do majorities say there is no such struggle in their countries (72% and 61%, respectively).
  • At least three-quarters of Muslims in Egypt and Pakistan say they would favor making each of the following the law in their countries: stoning people who commit adultery, whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery and the death penalty for those who leave the Muslim religion. Majorities of Muslims in Jordan and Nigeria also favor these harsh punishments.
  • Eight-in-ten Muslims in Pakistan say suicide bombing and other acts of violence against civilian targets in order to defend Islam from its enemies are never justified; majorities in Turkey (77%), Indonesia (69%) and Jordan (54%) share this view. Support for suicide bombing has declined considerably over the years. For example, while 74% of Muslims in Lebanon said these violent acts were at least sometimes justified in 2002, just 39% say that is the case now; double-digit declines have also occurred in Jordan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia.
  • Muslim publics overwhelmingly welcome Islamic influence over their countries' politics. In Egypt, Pakistan and Jordan, majorities of Muslims who say Islam is playing a large role in politics see this as a good thing, while majorities of those who say Islam is playing only a small role say this is bad for their country. Views of Islamic influence over politics are also positive in Nigeria, Indonesia, and Lebanon.
  • Hezbollah receives its most positive ratings in Jordan, where 55% of Muslims have a favorable view; a slim majority (52%) of Lebanese Muslims also support the group, which operates politically and militarily in their country. In most countries, views of Hamas and Hezbollah have changed little, if at all, since 2009. In Indonesia, however, more Muslims express favorable views of both groups now than did so last year; 39% now have positive views of Hamas, compared with 32% last year, and 43% have favorable opinions of Hezbollah, compared with 29% in 2009. And among Nigerian Muslims, favorable views of both Hamas and Hezbollah are now less common than they were in 2009 (49% vs. 58% and 45% vs. 59%, respectively).
Muslim Networks and Movements in Western Europe
September 16, 2010
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1731/muslim-networks-movements-western-europe


Introduction

Over the past two decades, the number of Muslims living in Western Europe has steadily grown, rising from less than 10 million in 1990 to approximately 17 million in 2010.1 The continuing growth in Europe's Muslim population is raising a host of political and social questions. Tensions have arisen over such issues as the place of religion in European societies, the role of women, the obligations and rights of immigrants and support for terrorism. These controversies are complicated by the ties that some European Muslims have to religious networks and movements outside of Europe. Fairly or unfairly, these groups are often accused of dissuading Muslims from integrating into European society and, in some cases, of supporting radicalism.

Perceptions About Links to Terrorism

Muslims have been present in Western Europe in large numbers since the 1960s, when immigrants from Muslim-majority areas such as North Africa, Turkey and South Asia began arriving in Britain, France, Germany and other European nations, often to take low-wage jobs.3 Many of the major Muslim networks and movements operating in Western Europe today originated in Muslim-majority countries, including Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The overseas origins of the groups, and their continuing ties to affiliates abroad, have prompted concerns that by strengthening Muslims' connections to the umma -- the world community of Muslim believers -- they may be encouraging Muslims to segregate themselves from the rest of European society. In addition, some in the West perceive many Muslim groups as fomenters of radical Islam and, ultimately, terrorism.

Small Membership, Large Influence

Although many Muslims in Western Europe participate in the activities of these movements and networks, the groups' formal membership rolls appear to be relatively small. Indeed, some studies suggest that relatively few Muslims in Europe belong to any religious organization in any formal sense, including mosques.

Despite their relatively low levels of formal membership, Muslim movements and networks often exert significant influence by setting agendas and shaping debates within Muslim communities in Western Europe. Whether or not they reflect the views of most Muslims in a community, they often are instrumental in determining which concerns receive attention as "Muslim issues" in the media, in government circles and in the broader public debate about Islam in Europe.

In addition, many Islamic groups now serve as interlocutors between Muslims and the governments of the European countries in which they live. This arrangement has often come about at the behest of government officials looking for organizations that can serve as conduits to their Muslim constituents. A number of European governments have established councils in recent years to reach out to their Muslim populations. For instance, in 2003, the French government partnered with a number of large Muslim groups to establish the Conseil Franšais du Culte Musulman (French Council of the Muslim Faith), which now serves as an official representative body for the country's Muslims in dealing with the government in much the same way that certain Catholic and Jewish organizations in France serve as official points of contact for their respective communities.

Pursuing Their Agendas

The growing connections between Islamic groups and European governments, as well as the integration of some of these groups into the continent's political mainstream, have not led to a decrease in activism on the part of these groups. If anything, Muslim groups and movements have become more visible on the European political stage and are becoming more adept at using national media and political channels to pursue a wide range of agendas. For example, the Muslim Association of Britain, an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, became a major player in Britain's anti-Iraq war movement by partnering with disaffected members of the British Labor Party and the Stop the War Alliance.

At the same time, the internet and other new technologies have allowed Islamic groups in Europe to reach Muslims worldwide. Some European-based groups are now exporting ideas, methods and money back to Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East, South Asia and elsewhere. European affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood, for example, are engaged in ongoing discussions with intellectuals and ideologues in the Middle East about participation in democratic politics. And radical groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, whose global headquarters are in the Middle East, rely on their European branches for publicity and fundraising.
Reading List